The DRAT Mumbai declined to register Appeal (D) No.1913/2023 because the appellant failed to remove registry defects despite sufficient opportunity, resulting in a presumption of lack of interest.
Appeal No.1913/2023 declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Mumbai
Appeal (D) No.1913/2023
Padmakumar Pandurang Mogare & Ors j ...Appellant i V/s. The Authorised Officer, Amravati Merchant Respondent Co-operative Bank Ltd J
Appeal (D) No.1913/2023 is listed in today’s board (09.05.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/renhoval of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None Present for Appellant when the matter was called out.
Appeal (D) No.1913/2023 was filed on 03.11.2023 and certain objections were raised by the’registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date. i ■ l
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of Pursis filed for withdrawal & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Appeal (D) No.1913/2023 is hereby declined for Registration.
09.05.2024
istrar (l/C)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal failing to remove registry defects within the stipulated time should be registered.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Padmakumar Pandurang Mogare & Ors
The Authorised Officer, Amravati Merchant Co-operative Bank Ltd
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
