In DRAT Misc. Appeal (D) No. 132/2024, the Tribunal declined the registration of the appeal as the appellant failed to remove registry objections despite sufficient opportunity, presuming a lack of interest.
The appeal is declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Misc.Appeal (D) No.132/2024
Reena Subhash Pass! & Ors
....Appellant
V/s.
Unity Small Finance Bank Ltd & Anr
...Respondent
Misc.Appeal (D) No. 132/2024 is listed in today’s board (06.11.2024) before the Reaistrar at 02 30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None Present for the Appellant when the matter was called out.
Misc.Appeal (D) No.132/2024 was filed on 25.01.2024 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of above & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Misc.Appeal (D) No. 132/2024 is hereby declined for Registration.
06.11.2024
egistr; 7C)
Reena Subhash Pass! & Ors
Unity Small Finance Bank Ltd & Anr
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
