Laxmi Rani Roy v. Karnataka Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the appellant, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed applications for condonation of delay and waiver of pre-deposit under the Limitation Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as time barred and not maintainable.
What did the court decide?
Applications for condonation of delay and waiver of pre-deposit dismissed in default; appeal dismissed as time barred and not maintainable.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 708 of 2023
(Arising out of S.A. 282 of 2019 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.02.2024 Laxmi Rani Roy … Appellant -VsKarnataka Bank Limited & 2 Others … Respondents Mr. Proshit Deb, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Aasia Hasan with Mr. Mayank Shah, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for the Appellant.
Application, being I.A. 387 of 2023, for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and I.A. 388 of 2023 for waiver from pre deposit are dismissed in default.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 708 of 2023, is also dismissed being time barred and not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable and time barred in the absence of appearance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Laxmi Rani Roy
- respondent
Karnataka Bank Limited
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090007082023
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court