Vinodkumar Ramgopalji Gilada v. Ao, Cfm Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed an intervention application filed by a successful auction purchaser to be impleaded as an additional respondent in the pending appeal without objection from other parties.
What did the court decide?
Intervention application allowed; auction purchaser impleaded as additional respondent; consequential amendments to be carried out within two weeks.