The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for extension of time or waiver regarding a pending ₹2.30 lakh pre-deposit. Finding no bonafide intent, the Court declined the prayer and dismissed the appeal.
Extension of time and waiver of payment were denied; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 12/2024(EoT) In
Appeal on Diary No. 2234/2023
Between
Sonali Sunil Biradar … Appellant/s V/s.
Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s An Advocate for the Appellant appears through Video Conferencing.
Mr Vijay V. Chandavale, Advocate for Respondent Bank appeared through Video Conferencing.
-: Order dated: 05/01/2024:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
1
instalment are that the Appellant is undergoing financial strain and that due to the hospitalisation of the Appellant's son and for his surgery etc; expenses were incurred and he could not not arrange for the money.
Misc. Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-5
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appellant is entitled to either a waiver or an extension of time to deposit the pending second instalment of pre-deposit.
Sonali Sunil Biradar
Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
