Nitinbhai Ghnashyambhai Mehta v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal withheld on behalf of non-appearance; restored to court for further orders in I.A. for waiver of deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 114/2024 (WoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 2250/2023
Between
Nitinbhai Ghanshyambhai Mehta … Appellant/s V/s.
HDFC Ltd.
…Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 05/08/2024: -
There has been no representation for the appellant or the respondent on 04.07.2024 when the matter was called for a hearing on the application for waiver of deposit. Today also there is no representation for either the appellant or the respondent.
I assume that the appellant is not keen on prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-04
1
Nitinbhai Ghanshyambhai Mehta
HDFC Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court