Elizabeth Jasmine v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of a conditional order dated 1.4.2024, which mandated a monetary deposit by a specified deadline. The appellants failed to deposit the required amount, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal rejected; no relief granted to appellants; statutory deposit not complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 16th Day of April, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 1262/2023
(IA 2105/2023 in SA 324/2023 on the file of DRT-1, Ernakulam)
Between
- Smt. Elizabeth Jasmine, W/o Thomas Chacko,
497, Peraparambil House 42, Thrikkanarvattom,
Vaduthala,
Cochin 23.
- P.C. Thomas, S/o P.T. Chacko, 497, Peraparambil House 42, Thrikkanarvattom,
Vaduthala,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-compliance of the conditional order regarding statutory deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Elizabeth Jasmine W/o Thomas Chacko
- appellant
P.C. Thomas S/o P.T. Chacko
- respondent
The Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Ernakulam Main Branch
- respondent
The Asset Recovery Officer, Indian Overseas Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 331090012622023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court