Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Limited v. Ms Polo Amusement Park Limited and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent on the hearing date despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1486/2023 Date: 02.12.2024
Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs. M/s Polo Amusement Park Ltd. & 2 Ors.
Present: None for the appellant, Shri Abhishek Kapariya, Advocate holding brief of Shri Harsh Chopra, counsel for all the respondents,
Today, none is present on behalf of the appellant even in the revised reading of the cause list, therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd.
M/s Polo Amusement Park Ltd.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court