P. Durairaj v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against pre-deposit order rejected as appellant failed to comply with Tribunals order requiring 25% statutory deposit within stipulated time limits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 22nd day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
IA 315/2024 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 336/2024
(Arising out of S.A.No.886/2023 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
P. Durairaj, Son of Palanisamy, No. 5/107, Thamburettipalayam,
Kolumangalu, Kolumangali, Tiruppur, Thyampalayam, Tamil Nadu – 638 703.
… Appellant
And
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal appeals against pre-deposit order can be proceeded with on non-compliance with the statutory deposit
Whether the waiver application for deferment of pre-deposit can be allowed
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. Durairaj
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch
- respondent
The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090003362024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court