Christ M Miller v. Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the IA/207/2024 and rejected the principal appeal AIR(SA) 96/2024 for default, as the appellant was absent and showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed IA 207/2024 for default and rejected Appeal AIR (SA) 96/2024.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 10th day of June, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 207/2024
in
AIR(SA) 96/2024
(SA No. 748/2023 on the File of DRT, Madurai)
Between
Mr. Christ M. Miller(Guarantor), S/o Maria John, No.74, John Ilam, St. Mary’s Street, Ramanputhoor, Nagercoil, Konam Post – 629 004,
Represented by his Power Agent, M.Alber Maria John Mathiarasu, S/o Maria John, No.74, John Illam, St. Mary’s Street, Ramanputhoor, Nagercoil, Konam Post, Kanyakumari – 629 004.
…Appellant
AND
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss an appeal for default due to the appellant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Christ M. Miller
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, The Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank
- respondent
The Branch Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court