Canara Bank v. M/S Ganpati Gift House and Trading Company and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant bank did not appear. The court dismissed the appeal in default for nonprosecution.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 213/2020 Date: 05.09.2024
Canara Bank Vs. M/s Ganpati Gift House and Trading Company & 2 Ors.
Present: None for the appellant-Bank, Shri Swayambhoo Chandranshul, counsel for all the respondents,
No one appears on behalf of the appellant even in the revised list. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondents that the learned counsel for the appellant is not appearing deliberately and delaying the matter, as the appeal pertains to the year 2020, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed in default.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
M/s Ganpati Gift House and Trading Company
- respondent
2 Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090002132020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court