Bagilthaya Subramanya v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the waiver application without hearing, holding that the appellant failed to comply with the Hon'ble High Court's conditional order, leading to the dismissal of the underlying appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 18th Day of December, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 503/2024 (Waiver) In AIR (SA) 789/2024
(Arising out of SA 61/2023 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
J. Srinivasalu Residing at No.91, 1st Floor, 6th Cross Patel Muniyappa layout, V.Naganhalli RT Nagar (P), Bangalore – 32
Also at:
Mr.J.Srinivasalu No.366, Arasamara Street Venkatesamudram Post Via Thuthipet, Ambur Taluk Tirupattur District – 635 811 …Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India Asset Recovery Branch No.2/3, Raja building, N.R.Road Bengaluru – 560 002 …..Respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
J. Srinivasalu
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India Asset Recovery Branch
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090007692023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court