Baby John v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal permitted the appellants to withdraw Application IA 426/2024 and appellant AIR (SA) 493/2024 was rejected as the application was recorded as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn; appeal rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 22nd day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 426/2024 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 493/2024
(Arising out of I.A.No.1008/2024 in S.A.No.197/2024 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
- Baby John S/o. K.P. John, Kizhakkebhagathu House, Kadavoor P.O, Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam District – 686 671.
- Lucy Baby W/o. Baby John, Kizhakkebhagathu House, Kadavoor P.O, Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam District – 686 671.
… Appellants
And
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Baby John
- appellant
Lucy Baby
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court