Ask Jori house v. Icici Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as filed in the absence of the Appellant for non-payment of costs, recording default under the last mentioned order.
What did the court decide?
The Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed in default.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 754 of 2023
(Arising out of I.A. 2333 of 2023 in S.A. 711 of 2022 of DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
10.01.2024 A. Sk. Jori House … Appellant -VsICICI Bank Limited & Another … Respondents None for Appellant Mr. Avishek Guha with Ms. Ishita Ghosh, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Despite order dated 5th January, 2024 neither costs are paid nor Appellant is present.
Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Application, being Misc. Appeal Diary No. 754 of 2023, stands dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Sk. Jori House
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 191090007542023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court