M/S. Aman Infratex Ltd. v. Edelweiss Assets Recostruction Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT Registrar declined to register Appeal No. 1058/2023. The appellant was absent and failed to comply with registry objections regarding defects, leading to a presumption of non-interest in the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Appeal (D) No. 1058/2023
Aman Infratex Ltd & Ors
Appellants
V/s.
Authorised Officer,Edelweiss Asset-
Reconstruction Co. Ltd & Ors Respondents
•|
Appeal (D) No. 1058/2023 is listed in today’s board (14.03.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
x
None present for the Appellants when matter is called.
Appeal (D) No.1058/2023 was filed on 26.06.2023 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Infratex Ltd
- respondent
Authorised Officer, Edelweiss Asset-Reconstruction Co. Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court