M/S Abhinav Furniture v. Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT Mumbai listed a miscellaneous appeal for compliance/removal of defects. As the appellant was absent and failed to comply despite sufficient opportunity, the court presumed lack of interest and declined its registration under Rule 6(4).
What did the court decide?
The miscellaneous appeal was declined for registration.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
T I
Misc.Appeal (D) No.1167/2022
Abhlnav Furniture & Anr
Appellant
V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd
...Respondent
Misc.Appeal (D) No. 1167/2022 is listed in today’s board (15.05.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM forcompliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also oh the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None present for the Appellant when matter is called.
Misc.Appeal (D) No.1167/2022 was filed on 16.11.2022 and certain objections were raised by the registry for conipliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abhlnav Furniture & Anr
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 271090011672022
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court