Velusamy v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal in debt recovery matter dismissed/declined by DRAT under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, due to non-compliance of office objections despite time given.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:403/202 2
Velusamy V/S Canara Bank & Anr
24/05/2023
None for Appellant.
None of the office objections are complied yet, despite considerable time given.
Accordingly, The Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, as objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Velusamy
- respondent
Canara Bank & Anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090004032022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court