Veena Textiles Ltd. v. Idbi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal declined because office objections under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 were not complied with in time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:347/2022
M/S Veena Textiles Ltd V/S Ifci Ltd & Ors
20/01/2023
Appellant Counsel present and requests for numbering the Appeal.
Office objections are not complied yet with respect to Appeal not in prescribed format.
Hence appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections are not complied in sufficient time despite opportunities given.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/S Veena Textiles Ltd
- respondent
Ifci Ltd & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090003472022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · R. Sathyanarayanan
- Order 2 — this page · R. Sathyanarayanan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court