The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai declined the appeal filed by M/S United Steel Allied Industries Pvt Ltd against Indian Bank because the appellant failed to comply with office objections within the stipulated time under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:791/2023
M/S United Steel Alied Industries Pvt Ltd V/S Indian Bank
18/08/2023
Appellant counsel G. Santosh Kumar for Appellant present.
None of the office objections are complied yet.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be admitted when office objections were not complied within the prescribed time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S United Steel Allied Industries Pvt Ltd
Indian Bank
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
