Union Bank of India v. Chetna Communication
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order scheduling a hearing for service of notice where the original notice to respondents 1 and 2 was returned. Ordered service by newspaper publication within 10 days and listed for 02.11.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 878/2022 Date: 18.07.2023
Union Bank of India Vs. Chetna Communication
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri Shantanu Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 3- Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 17.07.2023 shows that the notice sent to the respondent nos. 1 & 2 has returned back with endorsement “the addressee does not reside at the given address”. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 1 & 2 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser files reply after serving copy of the same upon the counsel for the appellant, who may file rejoinder by the next date.
List this case on 02.11.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare
Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank of India
- other
Chetna Communication
- respondent
Respondent No. 1
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- respondent
Respondent No. 3
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090008782022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court