Uco Bank v. Ms Pratyush Steels
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 491/2023 Date: 08.05.2023
UCO Bank Vs. M/s Pratyush Steels Vs. Pawan Kumar Mishra
Shri Pawan Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present. Ld. Counsel mentioned fee details at Para 10. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the interim relief has also been sought in the appeal and is supported by the affidavit, hence, affidavit on Stay Application is not required and further prayed that the matter be placed before the Hon’ble Court in view of the urgency.
The present appeal has been filed by the Bank under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against the final order dated 17.03.2023 passed by DRT, Jabalpur in S.A. No. 292/2021. in
List this case before Hon’ble Court on 10.05.2023 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
M/s Pratyush Steels
- respondent
Pawan Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090004912023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court