The tribunal did not find any urgency to proceed with the transfer petition as the supporting application for urgency was not annexed. The respondent is directed to file opposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Transfer Petition No. 07 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.10.2023 M/s. Deep Cement Suppliers & 2 Others … Applicants -VsPunjab National Bank ... Respondents Mr. Gaurav Singh with Mr. Siddhartha Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Counsel for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Heard the Learned Counsel for Applicants. It appears that the application on the basis of which the Learned Counsel is pressing for urgency in the matter is not annexed with the petition for the reasons best known to the Applicants. In such circumstances, at the moment, I do not find any urgency in the matter to transfer the case.
Accordingly, Respondent may file opposition within two weeks.
List on 22nd November, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 06th October, 2023 01/ac
M/s. Deep Cement Suppliers & 2 Others
Punjab National Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
