Transfer petition for moving an appeal from DRT-2 Kolkata was dismissed as it became infructuous because the Presiding Officer had taken over the department.
Transfer petition dismissed with no costs; file consigned to record room; copies supplied to parties and concerned DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Transfer Petition No. 16 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
14.12.2023
Sudip Kumar Ghosh
… Appellants Vs.
State Bank of India
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Mahim Sasmal, ld. Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Nimish Mishra, ld. Adv. Respondent no.2 Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, ld. Adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
This Transfer Petition is filed for transfer of Appeal No.06 of 2023 from the file of DRT-2 Kolkata to some other DRT. Since Presiding Officer has taken over charge of DRT-2 Kolkata, this petition has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed.
Transfer petition is dismissed. No costs.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 14th day of December, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 14.12.2023 11 /pkb
Sudip Kumar Ghosh
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
