Dismissed
S Thangaprabhu v. Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal declined in DRAT due to non-compliance of office objections, including deficit court fee, as per Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:854/2023
¶3
S.Thangaprabhu & Anr V/S Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
¶4
16/10/2023
¶5
None for Appellant.
¶6
None of the office objections including Deficit Court fee not complied yet till date.
¶7
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶8
Sd/-
¶9
Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S. Thangaprabhu & Anr
- respondent
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090008542023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court