Tadikamalla Brahmanandam v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal was dismissed by default as the appellant did not appear before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 370 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. No.506 of 2018 in DRT Visakhapatnam
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
09.02.2023
Tadikamalla Brahmanandam … Appellant -VsSyndicate Bank & ors ….Respondents None for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up. None is present for the Appellant. Appeal is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tadikamalla Brahmanandam
- respondent
Syndicate Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090003702019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court