Swadesh Ranjan Das v. Ao Bangiya Gramin Vikas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In a mention order dated 09.08.2023, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal corrected a clerical error in a previous order by replacing the wrongly typed name of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent. The matter was adjourned with no substantive disposal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Rectified the name of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent in a previous order dated 4th August, 2023.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 640 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 274 of 2018 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
09.08.2023 Swadesh Ranjan Das
… Appellant -VsBangiya Gramin Vikas Bank … Respondent
Mr. Basudeb Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mentioned
Learned Counsel for Respondent made an oral mention that in the order dated 4th August, 2023 the name of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent has been wrongly typed as “Debasish Mukherjee” instead of “Basudeb Mukherjee”.
Accordingly, the name of the Learned Counsel for the Respondent be replaced with “Basudeb Mukherjee” in place and stead of “Debasish Mukherjee”.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Swadesh Ranjan Das
- respondent
Bangiya Gramin Vikas Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090006402022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court