Sureshkumar M v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellant failed to deposit the mandatory amount by the extended deadline. Without a stay from the High Court on their writ petition, the Tribunal refused further time and rejected the appeal under the SARFAESI Act.
What did the court decide?
No. Appeal AIR 702/2023 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 25th of September, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 702/2023
(IA No. 178 of 2023 in SA No. 33/2023 on the file of DRT I, Ernakulam)
Between
Sureshkumar M.,
S/o Bhaskaran Nair, Sreedevi Nilayam, Madasseri Road, P.O. Edathara, Palakkad – 678 611.
… Appellant
And
- The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, 7th Floor, Vankararath Building,
Palarivattom – 682 024.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal was maintainable notwithstanding a filed writ petition without a stay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sureshkumar M.
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
- respondent
Mukundanunni
- respondent
Krishnakumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court