Suresh Kumar P S v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellant was absent in hearings and failed to prosecute the Appeal and Inter Applications. The Tribunal dismissed the applications for default and rejected the underlying Appeal.
What did the court decide?
IA 127/2022 dismissed for default, Stay Application dismissed, Appeal A.IR:75/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 127/2022 in A.IR:75/2022
Sureshkumar P S V/S Canara Bank
23/02/2023
No representation for Petitioner/Appellant.
This matter is posted today for dismissal as Petitioner/Appellant was absent on previous hearings i.e. 26.09.2022 and 30.12.2022.
To give an opportunity to Petitioner/Appellant, matter is kept under the caption “for dismissal”. In spite of that Petitioner/Appellant evinced no interest in prosecuting the Applications. Therefore, IA 127/2022 is dismissed for default. Consequently, other Application viz., Stay is dismissed and Appeal A.IR:75/2022 is rejected.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sureshkumar P S
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090000752022
- Bench
- S Ravi Kumar
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court