R Subramanian v. Yes Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed a miscellaneous application, setting aside a default order and restoring several other applications for disposal.
What did the court decide?
Miscellaneous Application allowed, default order set aside, multiple applications restored for disposal; each party bears own costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Misc.Appl. 18/2022 in A.IR:809/2017
R.Subramanian V/S Yes Bank Ltd &Ors
05/10/2023
Order pronounced (vide separate Order) in open court. The Miscellaneous Application 18/2022 is allowed and default Order dated 24.06.2022 is set aside. Office shall restore IA 387/2020 (Delay in Restoration), IA 388/2020 (Restoration), IA 389/2020 (Delay in Representation), IA 390/2020 (Delay), IA 391/2020 (Waiver) and AIR 809/2017 to file, for their disposal in accordance with law. Both parties shall bear their own costs.
Sd/-
Chair Person
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Subramanian
- respondent
Yes Bank Ltd &Ors
Coram
Chair Person
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090008092017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
24 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/s. Richros Builders rep by its Sole Proprietor B. Antony Raj versus The Chief Manager / Authorized Officer under Sarfaesi Act Uco Bank
Tamilnadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd. versus The State Bank of Trivancore
Our Lady of Lourdes Educational Trust rep. by its Managing Trustee versus The Authorized Officer under Sarfeasi Act Varthana Finance Private Limited
Kotak Mahindra Bank versus Mrs K Valarmathi