R.Subramanian v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Misc. Appl. 19/2022, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the application, set aside the default order dated 24.06.2022, and directed restoration of multiple interim applications to file for disposal. Costs were borne by both parties.
What did the court decide?
Default order dated 24.06.2022 set aside; IA 392/2020, IA 393/2020, IA 394/2020, IA 395/2020, IA 396/2020 and AIR 810/2017 restored to file for disposal.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Misc.Appl. 19/2022 in A.IR:810/2017
R.Subramanian V/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd &Ors
05/10/2023
Order pronounced (vide separate Order) in open court. The Miscellaneous Application 19/2022 is allowed and default Order dated 24.06.2022 is set aside. Office shall restore IA 392/2020 (Delay in Restoration), IA 393/2020 (Restoration), IA 394/2020 (Delay in Representation), IA 395/2020 (Delay), IA 396/2020 (Waiver) and AIR 810/2017 to file, for their disposal in accordance with law. Both parties shall bear their own costs.
Sd/-
Chair Person
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Subramanian
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Ors
Coram
Chair Person
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090008102017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/s. Richros Builders rep by its Sole Proprietor B. Antony Raj versus The Chief Manager / Authorized Officer under Sarfaesi Act Uco Bank
Tamilnadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd. versus The State Bank of Trivancore
Our Lady of Lourdes Educational Trust rep. by its Managing Trustee versus The Authorized Officer under Sarfeasi Act Varthana Finance Private Limited
Kotak Mahindra Bank versus Mrs K Valarmathi