The Fourth Bench of DRAT Chennai found the appeal infructous because the account with Bajaj Finance Ltd was regularized and nothing survived, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and rejection of the appeal.
Application dismissed as infructous. Appeal rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 25/2023
in A.IR:470/2022
Subburaman Traders V/S A.O.,Bajaj Finance Ltd &Ors
07/09/2023
Ld. Counsel for petitioner /appellant submitted that account of the petitioner/appellant is regularized and nothing survives and Appeal has become infructous.
Considering the said submission, Application IA 25/2023 (Waiver) is dismissed as infructous. Consequently, Appeal AIR (SA) 470/2022 is rejected.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Subburaman Traders
A.O., Bajaj Finance Ltd & Ors
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
