State Bank of India v. Ishrat Jahan
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 173/2020 Date: 12.04.2023
State Bank of India Vs. Ishrat Jahan
Present: None for the appellant, None for the respondent No. 1, Shri Ashok Pandey along with Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent No. 2,
Ex-parte against the respondents No. 3 to 5,
It has been brought to the notice of this court that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence the adjournment is sought for.
List this case along with Regular Appeal No. 10/2021 and Appeal Dy. No. 172/2020 on 31.07.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Ishrat Jahan
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090001732020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court