Sri Dharani Enterprises v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of a prayer to cross-examine a witness in a pending debtor recovery suit. The Tribunal held failure to apply earlier indicated intent to delay and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Application for cross-examination dismissed; Appeal dismissed; All incidental applications disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 613 of 2023
(Arising out of I.A. No. 1116 of 2022 in O.A. No. 415 of 2013 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.10.2023
Sri Dharani Enterprises rep. by Sri Kakarla Dasaradha
Ramaiah ... Appellants
-Vs-
ICICI Bank Limited and others
……Respondents
Mr. Subhrajyoti Dey, Md. Dilwar Khan, Mr. Kamran Hussain, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Abhishek Guha, Learned Counsel Mr. Somraj Naskar, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appellant was entitled to cross-examine a witness at the admission stage of the appeal when no application had been made before filing original evidence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri Dharani Enterprises rep. by Sri Kakarla Dasaradha Ramaiah
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited and others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 191090006132023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court