Smt Yamsani Jayalaxmi v. Ap grameena Vikas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was treated as time-barred. An interim application seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was dismissed because the appellant failed to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay.
What did the court decide?
Interim application for condonation of delay dismissed; Appeal dismissed as time-barred.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Appeal Dy No. 142 of 2019
(Arising out of SA No. 71 of 2017 In DRT-I Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
21.02.2023
Smt. Yamsani Jayalaxmi
… Appellant
-Vs-
AP Grameena Vikas Bank
… Respondents
Mr. N. Srinivas, ld counsel for the appellant. Mr. S. Banerjee, ld. Counsel with Mr. H.C. Yadav, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. No. 528 of 2019 is filed by the appellant u/s 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 75 days in filing the appeal. Impugned order was passed on 25.02.2019 whereas appeal is filed on 14.06.2019.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 75 days in filing an appeal under the Limitation Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Yamsani Jayalaxmi
- respondent
AP Grameena Vikas Bank
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090001422019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court