Smt Sunita Tarachand Khurana v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t
|»»•
$|■/
. •
-
-r
• ?
’•••a ;•-
f
i
4
I!
_ L_
I
I
04.-
. sjepj'o B.iiosJechjeHij /'JOpio fl^Qicioii 'p
oeouBjHe.eldyJeqjp^ 03|jjp;C ;
. -
■ .-.p- ■■
J
••|> •
■ •
•
tiB
i|■ ■ WT
‘
s|^
ag|
|---|---|---|---|---|
.».‘.«siSsehyJs^.T • -
^g-WVERYAPgEU^rE TRIBUNAL, MUMBA8
Miso Application No. .of 20
. In ------- ^kNoT.
No. :V4~V\ of 20 2^2> J>/^
. . P//IZ .
k Appoint.
(Advocnfo
1)
Versus
v ...Hospondonto
X<bpc F ^5^ LTb
(Advocnis '■— -------------- J
Data Office Notes, Appearances
end Reglskar'^ordor I Chairperson's Orders
I Appeal preeeiitedI., by ^VsOhrVcsO^X^ F^osXTv^X>
Advocate for AjTpellant with folWlfe Of Rs. 3^5d>4-5"
on
-.1^^ |^ng aggrieved by (he Impugned order / liual-efttei
Passoc* on hi S.A. /JSTA. No'349 of 20^
by PRinr?' AY^YOCZ^^f^nt^.rLR.A I" I Arl-<pQ3^/ 18 of
S.A.R.FAE^.I, Act 2002.
Exh - I Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance lo
REGISTI R
rMov^e ftrzrboVh PcverMe^
Rdj fbzT Rer^&’VdJ oP-cl 22/01 /T-ex^ -
•
h ’ " ■ ■ V C ■■ - —
T;6 -gegfe^aTaTri.
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090017112023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Nishad Fazil F
- Order 2 · Nishad Fazil F
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court