shri shanmuga stores v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
DRAT declined the appeal due to non-compliance of office objections within the prescribed reasonable time under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declared declined and dismissed under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:361/2023
Shri Shanmuga Stores V/S Canara Bank & Ors
04/08/2023
Ld. Counsel Periyasamy for Appellant present.
None of the office objections complied yet.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Shanmuga Stores
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090003612023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court