The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, recorded that defects in the appellant's filing were reconciled via a waiver and delay condonation application. The court held the appeal to be in order for admission.
The appeal is admitted as an orderly appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Dy. No. 1220/2023
Shri Parmendra Kumar Singh V/S Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
Date: 27/10/2023
Ld. Counsel for the appellant, Sh. Muzzammil I. Qureshi, is present.
Ld. Counsel mentioned Pin code in address and particulars of Court fee at para 10 of the memo.
Ld. Counsel filed Delay Condonation Application with proper Court fee.
All defects reconciled. Appeal is in order.
The present Regular Appeal is filed u/s 20 of the RDB Act, 1993 against the Final Order dated 08.08.2023 passed in O.A. No. 502 of 2020 by DRT, Allahabad. Waiver Application (I.A. No. 788/2023) and Delay Condonation Application (I.A. No. 863/2023) filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Court on 07.11.2023 for admission.
Registrar ALLAHABAD DRAT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Regular Appeal filed under Section 20 of the RDB Act, 1993 is in order despite defects in the memo and delay in filing.
Whether the Waiver and Delay Condonation Applications filed pursuant to the appeal are acceptable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Parmendra Kumar Singh
Indian Bank
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
