Shiv kishor properties and developersllp v. asset care and reconstruction enterprises Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The provided text is insufficient to extract parties or substantive issues; it consists primarily of header and picture text from an office memo.
What the court decided
| Date | .'. Offico’Notea, Appearances and Registrar’s.order/Chairperson’s Orders . |
|
|---|---|---|
| \O/n/-20<23 | r .A ■ 'd- ■ :r _(Nor>e _Pb'zT'bd'Vh paryKeS', Picij' Fdftr (^^i<r’0'VoJ o^d ejects 4d - o |
/£/ •' The Registrar is on Leave. Hence, the Board is Discharged $0 For "< pZ to d - Rg^trer(lte) ■' '• • U-’. |
FARAD
B^Ig-^g£QYEgYAPPEU.ATE TRIBUNAL, MUMRA8
Mlsc Application No. of2n
In ------------------ .-JrNor
-■Appaat No.No. _ __ L^l-^of 20 2^ J7a/
. ..P//1/
...Appellants
(Advocate. 1< Z^cU/
------------ :-------------- )
Versus
-
C^OOX^ .COkT Respondents;
(Advocate,
J
- . , , -in 'i-l.iMi_u__ u._.,_______M
' -ii irr^TXTinj
Dato Office Notes, Appearances
. and Registrar's order / Chairperson's Orders
«-^'23
Appeal presented .. by. ic Ls^o<br>Advocate for Appellant with UDof Rs, on
being aggrieved by the Impugned order / fjiX order
passed on iinlS.A.TTstx. /^A. No. of
J
!?y DKTr-rtf^ u/s gQ.Qf R.D.D.B.a F l-Act 1003 / 18 of
S.A.R.F.AKS.I. Act 2002,
Exh - 1 ' Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance to
i
I
M/0S/2CXE
REGISTRAR
None .fb'zr bd+> H<s
-fo IS/og/^
Ax?T I —
^X\C-
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090010152023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court