K C Shafeeque v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal rejected in DRAT at Chennai due to non-compliance of office objections under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
None; appeal declined.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:283/2022
K.C.Shafeeque & Anr V/S Hdfc Bank Ltd
09/01/2023
Appellant’s Counsel present.
The pending office objections have not been complied yet.
Hence Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.C. Shafeeque & Anr
- respondent
Hdfc Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090002832022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court