Seema Randip Singh Thakur v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal when appellants failed to deposit the required ₹17 lakhs per-deposit by the stipulated deadline of 23.06.2023.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the per-deposit requirement.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 751/2023
Between
Seema Randip Singh Thakur & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. …Respondent/s
Ms. Ketki Minhas, i/b M/s. H & M Legal Associates, Advocate for Respondent.
The Appellants were directed to deposit a sum of ₹ 17 lakhs as per-deposit for entertaining the Appeal.
The 1st instalment was payable, on or before 23.06.2023. The Appellants have not complied with the direction which entails in dismissal of the Appeal.
Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Miscellaneous if are dismissed as Applications, any,
infructuous.
psa-15
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Seema Randip Singh Thakur & Anr.
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 271090007512023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 — this page · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court