Sanjit Kumar Keshri And Ors. v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate court dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the Respondent Bank issued a fresh notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act on 7th November, 2022, after the appeal was filed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 558 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No.19 of 2017 in DRT-2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
09.02.2023 Sanjit Kumar Keshri and 3 ors … Appellant -VsICICI Bank Limited and Anr ….Respondents Mr. Debasish Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel, Ms. Sarmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Ms. Ishita Ghosh, Learned Counsel, Ms. Shreyasi Sen, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
This is an appeal against a judgment dated 06.06.2022. As per the instructions received, Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that a fresh notices under Section 13 (2) of SARFAESI Act has been issued by the Bank on 7th November, 2022. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that since a fresh notice has been issued appeal becomes infructuous. Impugned order also could not sustain. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sanjit Kumar Keshri and 3 ors
- respondent
ICICI Bank Limited and Anr
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090005582022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court