Sandeep Bhatia v. Dena Bank and 2 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 441/2019 Date: 18.07.2023
Sandeep Bhatia Vs. Dena Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Ashutosh Sharma, counsel for the appellant, Heard the learned counsel for the applicant on the urgency application being I.A. No. 566/2023.
For the reason stated in the urgency application, the same is allowed and the date already fixed for 07.08.2023 is preponed today.
It is contended by the counsel for the appellant that the Dena Bank has merged with the Bank of Baroda, therefore, the notice as directed earlier could not be served upon the Bank at the address specified in the present appeal. After merger, the address of the Bank is changed, therefore, an application for amendment in the array of party has been moved so that the service of notice may be effected upon the respondentBank.
Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-Bank of Baroda, who has been served with the copy of memo as well as urgency application. Let the respondent-Bank file response by the next date.
In view of the above, the amendment application being I.A. No. 529/2023 is allowed. Let the necessary amendment be made by the appellant in the array of parties within a week.
List this case on 03.11.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sandeep Bhatia
- respondent
Dena Bank
- intervenor
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090004412019
- Topic
- Contempt of Court
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court