Sai Krishna Chilukuri v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal declined the appeal in DRAT/A.IR:342/2023 without adjudication due to non-compliance of pending objections within the reasonable time stipulated under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:342/2023
Sai Krishna Chilukuri V/S Raju Chilukuri & Ors
06/07/2023
Representing counsel Shanmugam for Appellant present.
Few Objections are still pending for compliance.
Hence, Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994, as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sai Krishna Chilukuri
- respondent
Raju Chilukuri & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090003422023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court