Dismissed
Rosamma Tony v. the South Indian Bank Limited
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal in DRAT A.IR:1011/2023 declined due to non-compliance of objections under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:1011/2023
¶3
Rosamma Tony V/S The South Indian Bank Ltd &Ors
¶4
26/09/2023
¶5
None for Appellant. None of the Objections are complied yet. Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶6
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Rosamma Tony
- respondent
The South Indian Bank Ltd &Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090010112023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court