This order records the taking on record of the affidavit of service and notes that Respondent No. 1 was served but not represented. No substantive decision is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 80 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 18.09.2023 | Hero Fincorp Limited … -Vs- M/s. Matrix Hoardin Limited & Another.. Re |
Appellant g Private spondents |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rajeev Maity, Counsel for Appellant |
Learned |
|
| Mr. Sudhir Kumar Learned Counsel Respondent No. 2 |
Senapati, for the |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-Service filed by Appellant is taken on record. Respondent No. 1 is served but not represented. List on 2nd January, 2024 for hearing of appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 18th September, 202317
06/ac
Hero Fincorp Limited
M/s. Matrix Hoardin Limited & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
