Single line order recording non-service of notices due to lack of track report. Fresh notices were directed to be issued to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 78 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 155 of 2019 in DRT -Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
17.03.2023 Sri Venkateswara Engineering … Appellant -VsThotakura Prasad Rao & 4 ors ….Respondents Mr. P. Sreenivas, Learned Counsel Ms. Swarnali Dutta, Learned Counsel for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit of service shows that notices are not served as track report is not filed. Let fresh notices be issued to the Respondents. Affidavit of service be filed within three weeks.
List on 13th June, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 17th March, 2023 5/tp
Sri Venkateswara Engineering
Thotakura Prasad Rao & 4 ors
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
