The Tribunal allowed Respondent's application to set aside an ex-parte interim order dated 22.08.2022, as the applicant had explained reasons for non-appearance and no objection was filed by the Appellant.
The ex-parte order made against the Respondent is set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 428/2023
In
Appeal No. 78/2014
Between
Punjab National Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
Mr. Lalit Chimanlal Rao
…Respondent/s
An advocate for the Respondent is present.
-: Order dated: 04/08/2023:-
I.A. No. 428/2023 is an application filed by Respondent to set aside the ex-parte order made against him on 22.08.2022. There is no representation for the Appellant and no objection has been filed on this application to set aside the ex-parte. The reasons for remaining ex-parte have been explained in the application and hence, the I.A. is allowed and the ex-parte order made against the Respondent is set aside.
rm-16
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application to set aside an ex-parte order made against the respondent should be allowed.
Punjab National Bank
Mr. Lalit Chimanlal Rao
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
