Mr Rupesh Nandkumar Nadkar v. Idbi Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
is
L
| Date Office ■.NpteSi'Appearanceo and Registrar's order/.Chairperson's Orders |
1 |
|---|---|
| _-r_ | \ ■' t L |
| _' I' _. • I **1. ****f\ .** • . t |
J t 0 **V** J > X |
| >! | •• ’ _’< _J ■U i I |
i
L
x'!;ww; ■■ ■-
B^g-Bg^^XAPPEa^r^RBUNAL, MUMBAB
Wise Application No.
In "■ ----------- of20 -j^Hor
.‘Appoat No. ijyjjL of 202,3 J>//V
. .. P/4/ .■ ~
Oxy' - Appellants
(Advocnto J^OivCa •
J
Versus
...RcspondonU
(Advocate _
J
1
Data
, Offlcs Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order/Chairperson's Orders
Appeal presented by. OcyvG
Advocate for Appellant with Ci,p.^)$fe of rs. 5^^-
on
03^)6 ’2. being aggrieved by (he Impugned jawfer*/ final order
passed on No.
o
by drt?h^ Av^e; .u/s 20 of .R.D.D.B,& I- I Acl .1903 ./ iJB-efr-
Exh - I Appeal Memo
e/// /z°
S.O. for compliance lo
I
l
O^lll ^023.; Pckv- P^j <pfif^-t4Fd2T f^ppctlanV REGISTR,
fx/cx'e Pott Pe£ponoler\V-
Adv Appeltcm¥ S'e.eR A’rwe Pe?"??" P^rr^vcjJ OF d^’f^ec-te
£\Jj ftTT^erws'VGJ o^deFecA^hj . O \ / ol / 'ZolM
7 i S
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court