The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned the matter to allow the respondent to file vakalatnama and reply. No substantive decision was rendered on the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 74/2022
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s.
Prashant Ruia & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr Rajesh Nagory along with Mr Mihir Beradia, i/b M/s. Gandhi Law Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 09/02/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 seeks further time for filing vakalatnama and also a reply to the Appeal.
Post the matter on 24.04.2023 for filing vakalatnama and
reply
Sd/Chairperson
mks-3
1
State Bank of India
Prashant Ruia
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
