Appeal heard on urgency. Court directed notice to be served on the 2nd Respondent due to lack of service and post-poned hearing to 06.11.2023.
Accepting praecipe, directed notice to 2nd Respondent and posted hearing for 06.11.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No. 1880/2023
Between
Bushra Nizamuddin Ali … Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
…Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
-: Order dated: 02/11/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
It seems that the 2nd Respondent has not been served.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant is directed to serve the notice on the 2nd Respondent.
Post on 06.11.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-22
1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to provide notice to the 2nd respondent who has not been served.
Whether to adjourn/fix hearing post.
Bushra Nizamuddin Ali
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
